Package home | Report new bug | New search | Development Roadmap Status: Open | Feedback | All | Closed Since Version 1.32.0

Bug #12868 Test concering the layout fail
Submitted: 2008-01-09 20:26 UTC
From: dufuz Assigned: dufuz
Status: Assigned Package: pearweb (version CVS)
PHP Version: Irrelevant OS: N/A
Roadmaps: 1.19.0    
Subscription  
Comments Add Comment Add patch


Anyone can comment on a bug. Have a simpler test case? Does it work for you on a different platform? Let us know! Just going to say 'Me too!'? Don't clutter the database with that please !
Your email address:
MUST BE VALID
Solve the problem : 5 + 38 = ?

 
 [2008-01-09 20:26 UTC] dufuz (Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson)
Description: ------------ After the redesign of the page all the tests that test against the layout fail horribly, we have to get them up to standard before the next release.

Comments

 [2008-02-18 00:20 UTC] dufuz (Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson)
A good chunk of the tests have been updated but still don't pass because the expectf in pear test is frankly rather bad. I've discussed this with Greg and he came up with some good ideas which we'll be looking into, hopefully for pear 1.8 (and obviously pyrus), so until then I'm keeping the ticket open and perhaps adding 1.19.0 milestone on it since we can't really finish this before 1.18.0
 [2008-03-30 05:17 UTC] doconnor (Daniel O'Connor)
I don't suppose there would be any chance of heading towards a Selenium style test suite for the layout/UI components? Our work application benefits reasonably well from it, and the test writing requirements are less. For instance, a test becomes: SignupTest - Load this URL - Click these controls - Inspect the database for objects/records to have been created ... rather than picture perfect rendering.
 [2009-04-30 03:15 UTC] cweiske (Christian Weiske)
-Roadmap Versions: 1.18.0, 1.19.0 +Roadmap Versions: 1.19.0
 [2009-06-04 12:05 UTC] doconnor (Daniel O'Connor)
I made small inroads here.
 [2014-10-04 09:49 UTC] garrettw (Garrett Whitehorn)
Is this still an issue or has it been resolved?