Vote Details for "VersionNaming" by farell
| » Details |
|---|
|
| » Comment |
|
I like it; it's enough clear only for point below : You wrote : "- General discussion on pear-group indicated that no complete agreement could be reached on the 2 controversial points (RC/package state suffixes.), as a result, the conclusion is that they should be proposed as seperate RFC's." Does it means we have to vote without this particular but essential note (in my point of view: due to current conflit with case html_css) ? And should it be a limit in state suffix naming ? For example: x.y.zRCn with n = 1,2,3 what is the max ? x.y.zbetan with n = 1,2,3, what is the max ? Sorry if i've missed an important thread before ! |