Vote Details for "RFC_RulesOnRulesAndGuidlineProposals" by thesaur

» Details
  • Voter: Klaus Guenther 
  • Vote: +1 (not conditional)
  • Reviews: Deep source review
» Comment
Looks great to me. I hope this will provide a common ground for creativity rather than pointless flamewars. I was slightly skeptical before I saw it in use (the RFC_PearQA or whatever it was called). I'm now convinced.

Oh yeah... you might want to add a request that "Reviews" should not be necessary for RFC votes ;-)