Comments for "Config_Registry"

» Submit Your Comment
Comments are only accepted during the "Proposal" phase. This proposal is currently in the "Finished" phase.
» Comments

  • Chuck Hagenbuch  [2004-02-01 19:03 UTC]

    I'm completely neutral to this being in PEAR, since it duplicates Horde's existing code. However, given the extent to which it copies a large number of ideas from a core Horde package, it'd be nice to have Horde credited more directly by the package.

  • Laurent Laville  [2004-02-01 21:48 UTC]

    I'm totally agree with Chuck. As i took idea from Horde project, credits should be added.

    I've always thought that good idea or source code should be re-used than making it again and again.

    Just my point of view; hope you understand. And don't let away a good contribution.