<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet
href="http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/style.css" type="text/css"
?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel rdf:about="http://pear.php.net/bugs/search.php">
    <title>PEAR Bug Search Results</title>
    <link>http://pear.php.net/bugs/search.php?cmd=display&amp;package_name%5B0%5D=Net_FTP2</link>
    <description>Search Results</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>pear-webmaster@lists.php.net</dc:creator>
    <dc:publisher>pear-webmaster@lists.php.net</dc:publisher>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://pear.php.net/bugs"/>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
    <items>
     <rdf:Seq>
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pear.php.net/bug/7622" />

     </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>

  <image rdf:about="http://pear.php.net/gifs/pearsmall.gif">
    <title>PEAR Bugs</title>
    <url>http://pear.php.net/gifs/pearsmall.gif</url>
    <link>http://pear.php.net/bugs</link>
  </image>

    <item rdf:about="http://pear.php.net/bug/7622">
      <title>Net_FTP2: Feature/Change Request 7622 [Open] Do we really need a new separate package?</title>
      <link>http://pear.php.net/bugs/7622</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<pre>Net_FTP2 Feature/Change Request
Reported by jausions
2006-05-13T14:02:07+00:00
PHP: Irrelevant OS: Irrelevant Package Version: CVS

Description:
------------
Hi,

How is the progress going on this package? My question is whether or not a jump in version number is required for this package? Can't we just add a factory() method to allow for the other backend, while preserving BC with the current Net_FTP? User wishing to use the non-extension implementation would simply use the factory() method, whereas existing code would still work...

Just a suggestion...

That's the approach I took with Crypt_Blowfish (CVS version.)

Cheers,

 -Philippe</pre>]]></content:encoded>
      <description><![CDATA[<pre>Net_FTP2 Feature/Change Request
Reported by jausions
2006-05-13T14:02:07+00:00
PHP: Irrelevant OS: Irrelevant Package Version: CVS

Description:
------------
Hi,

How is the progress going on this package? My question is whether or not a jump in version number is required for this package? Can't we just add a factory() method to allow for the other backend, while preserving BC with the current Net_FTP? User wishing to use the non-extension implementation would simply use the factory() method, whereas existing code would still work...

Just a suggestion...

That's the approach I took with Crypt_Blowfish (CVS version.)

Cheers,

 -Philippe</pre>]]></description>
      <dc:date>2006-05-13T14:02:07+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>jausions &amp;#x61;&amp;#116; php &amp;#x64;&amp;#111;&amp;#x74; net</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Net_FTP2 Feature/Change Request</dc:subject>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
