http://pear.php.net/bugs/search.php?cmd=display&package_name%5B0%5D=Cache&PHPSESSID=6sh8hov6085gl1gd4s43b0k8h0 Search Results en-us pear-webmaster@lists.php.net pear-webmaster@lists.php.net hourly 1 2000-01-01T12:00+00:00 http://pear.php.net/gifs/pearsmall.gif http://pear.php.net/bugs http://pear.php.net/bugs/15902 Cache Bug Reported by cweiske 2009-02-16T08:13:26+00:00 PHP: 5.2.8 OS: Package Version: Description: ------------ mkdir() in pear/Cache/Container/file.php:120 fails when the parent directory does not exist. Using recursive mkdir (third parameter true) solves that. Test script: --------------- Expected result: ---------------- Actual result: --------------]]> Cache Bug Reported by cweiske 2009-02-16T08:13:26+00:00 PHP: 5.2.8 OS: Package Version: Description: ------------ mkdir() in pear/Cache/Container/file.php:120 fails when the parent directory does not exist. Using recursive mkdir (third parameter true) solves that. Test script: --------------- Expected result: ---------------- Actual result: --------------]]> 2009-02-16T08:14:08+00:00 cweiske at php dot net Cache Bug http://pear.php.net/bugs/14294 Cache Feature/Change Request Reported by amay 2008-07-04T19:40:29+00:00 PHP: Irrelevant OS: Package Version: 1.5.5RC4 Description: ------------ 1) I recommend to use a greater default highwater set for Cache_Graphics than 2 MB because this is fairly small for images. 2) It would be nice if one could set the highwater mark in the Cache_Graphics constructor. Expected result: ---------------- > 2 MB highwater If you want to be conservative, I think 32 MB would be a good choice, maybe 500 MB otherwise Actual result: -------------- 2 MB highwater]]> Cache Feature/Change Request Reported by amay 2008-07-04T19:40:29+00:00 PHP: Irrelevant OS: Package Version: 1.5.5RC4 Description: ------------ 1) I recommend to use a greater default highwater set for Cache_Graphics than 2 MB because this is fairly small for images. 2) It would be nice if one could set the highwater mark in the Cache_Graphics constructor. Expected result: ---------------- > 2 MB highwater If you want to be conservative, I think 32 MB would be a good choice, maybe 500 MB otherwise Actual result: -------------- 2 MB highwater]]> 2008-07-04T19:40:29+00:00 andimayer82 at gmail dot com Cache Feature/Change Request http://pear.php.net/bugs/11227 Cache Feature/Change Request Reported by didi0dmc 2007-06-05T02:56:44+00:00 PHP: Irrelevant OS: Package Version: 1.5.5RC4 Description: ------------ We may be able to get improved read performance of cache files (on the possible expense of slower writes), if we add another "mode" of operation to Container/file.php: (some pseudo code:) Instead of doing $cachedata = $this->decode(fread($fh, filesize($file))); the read could be implemented as: $cachedata = include($file); The save method would accordingly use something like: $cachedata = `var_export(func_get_arg(0), true)`; Obviously objects in the input data would have to be serialized first, this is probably the only real drawback.]]> Cache Feature/Change Request Reported by didi0dmc 2007-06-05T02:56:44+00:00 PHP: Irrelevant OS: Package Version: 1.5.5RC4 Description: ------------ We may be able to get improved read performance of cache files (on the possible expense of slower writes), if we add another "mode" of operation to Container/file.php: (some pseudo code:) Instead of doing $cachedata = $this->decode(fread($fh, filesize($file))); the read could be implemented as: $cachedata = include($file); The save method would accordingly use something like: $cachedata = `var_export(func_get_arg(0), true)`; Obviously objects in the input data would have to be serialized first, this is probably the only real drawback.]]> 2007-06-05T02:56:44+00:00 dieter dot rothacker at dmc dot de Cache Feature/Change Request http://pear.php.net/bugs/11226 Cache Feature/Change Request Reported by didi0dmc 2007-06-05T02:43:17+00:00 PHP: Irrelevant OS: Package Version: 1.5.5RC4 Description: ------------ To get an implementation of a performant in-memory cache, even for large server clusters, I propose a driver which interfaces to memcached. "memcached is a high-performance, distributed memory object caching system, generic in nature, but intended for use in speeding up dynamic web applications by alleviating database load." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memcached]]> Cache Feature/Change Request Reported by didi0dmc 2007-06-05T02:43:17+00:00 PHP: Irrelevant OS: Package Version: 1.5.5RC4 Description: ------------ To get an implementation of a performant in-memory cache, even for large server clusters, I propose a driver which interfaces to memcached. "memcached is a high-performance, distributed memory object caching system, generic in nature, but intended for use in speeding up dynamic web applications by alleviating database load." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memcached]]> 2007-09-21T06:04:30+00:00 dieter dot rothacker at dmc dot de Cache Feature/Change Request http://pear.php.net/bugs/11225 Cache Feature/Change Request Reported by didi0dmc 2007-06-05T02:31:03+00:00 PHP: Irrelevant OS: Package Version: 1.5.5RC4 Description: ------------ To improve the expensive Garbage Collection procedure of Container_file (opening each cache file and reading the expiry date from the file content), there are two possibilities: 1. put the expiry date into the filename and do only directory reads for GC 2. calculate the expiry date from the ctime of each file. This also needs no opening of the cache files Method 2 is probably "nicer", since it does not change the naming convention of cache files.]]> Cache Feature/Change Request Reported by didi0dmc 2007-06-05T02:31:03+00:00 PHP: Irrelevant OS: Package Version: 1.5.5RC4 Description: ------------ To improve the expensive Garbage Collection procedure of Container_file (opening each cache file and reading the expiry date from the file content), there are two possibilities: 1. put the expiry date into the filename and do only directory reads for GC 2. calculate the expiry date from the ctime of each file. This also needs no opening of the cache files Method 2 is probably "nicer", since it does not change the naming convention of cache files.]]> 2007-06-05T02:31:03+00:00 dieter dot rothacker at dmc dot de Cache Feature/Change Request